Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lighting Research and Technology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tregenza, P.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Standard skies for maritime climates

P.R. Tregenza, BArch MBdgSc PhD RIBA MCIBSE CEng

School of Architecture, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK

A set of 15 standard skies proposed by Kittler, Darula and Perez was compared with a large sample of measured sky luminance distributions from Singapore, Japan and the United Kingdom. It was found that (a) the standard set gives a good overall framework for categorising actual skies; (b) subsets of about four luminance distributions were adequate to describe the skies that occurred at each site; (c) inhomogeneity of actual skies in maritime climates leads to uncertainty in interior daylight predictions (typically the room illuminance computed on the best-fitting standard sky might have a variance such that 80% of calculated values lie between 0.8 and 1.3 of the real value); and (d) this error range is significantly less than when calculations are based on an overcast sky alone.

Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 3, 97-106 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719903100304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?