Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Lighting Research and Technology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyce, P.R.
Right arrow Articles by Rea, M.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Security lighting: Effects of illuminance and light source on the capabilities of guards and intruders{dagger}

P.R. Boyce, BSc PhD MIS MCIBSE

Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590, USA

M.S. Rea, PhD

Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180-3590, USA

An important function of perimeter security lighting is to enable guards to detect and recognise possible intruders. The experiments presented here were designed to systematically assess the performance of guards at these two tasks. The behaviour of intruders was also studied. Two experiments were undertaken on a large open field on four clear, moonless nights. In the first experiment, eighteen guards tried to detect and to recognise one of four intruders walking along a known path. In the second experiment the guards tried to detect an intruder moving in an unspecified manner across the open field. In the first experiment, the intruders provided data on the locations where they believed they had been detected and recognised. Their ability to see an acuity target located at the guard's position was also assessed. In the second experiment the intruders simply reported when they believed they had been detected. Both experiments were performed in the dark and under four different perimeter security lighting installations. Two light sources, low-pressure sodium and high-pressure sodium, and two lighting distributions, floodlighting and street lighting, were employed. The distances at which the guards detected and recognised the intruders were measured. The distances at which the intruders believed they had been detected and recognised were also measured. Measurements of vertical illuminance were obtained for the four security lighting installations, throughout the large open field. The main conclusions derived from the results are as follows. The presence of security lighting increases the distance at which intruders can be detected and recognised. A vertical illuminance in the range 4-10 lux will usually ensure a high level of detection and recognition. The low-pressure sodium discharge lamp is as effective as the high-pressure sodium discharge lamp for the detection of intruders and the recognition of their faces. Guards' and intruders' preferences for the different lighting conditions are consistent with the effect of those conditions on their ability to perform their respective tasks.

Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 57-79 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719002200201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?